Thursday, March 31, 2011

wealth formation

Wealth is the strength of every nation
Blood Supply to the Head and Neck
The Common Carotid Arteries (p. 804)

The Internal Carotid Artery (p. 804)
The External Carotid Arteries (p. 805)
Click here for a diagram of the external carotid artery and its branches.
The Superior Thyroid Artery (p. 805)
The Lingual Artery (p. 805)
The Facial Artery (p. 805)
The Ascending Pharyngeal Artery (p. 805)
The Occipital Artery (pp. 805-6)
The Posterior Auricular Artery (p. 806)

The Internal Jugular Vein (pp. 806-7)
Click here for a diagram on the internal jugular vein and its tributaries.
Tributaries of the Internal Jugular Vein (p. 807)

AORTIC ARCH

 

The arch of the aorta or the transverse aorta is the part of the aorta that begins at the level of the upper border of the second sternocostal articulation

 

OR

Arch of The Aorta - Cardiovascular System



The arch of the aorta or the transverse aorta is the part of the aorta that begins at the level of the upper border of the second sternocostal articulation of the right side, and runs at first upward, backward, and to the left in front of the trachea; it is then directed backward on the left side of the trachea and finally passes downward on the left side of the body of the fourth thoracic vertebra, at the lower border of which it becomes continuous with the descending aorta. It thus forms two curvatures: one with its convexity upward, the other with its convexity forward and to the left. Its upper border is usually about 2.5 cm. below the superior border to the manubrium sterni. It lies within the mediastinum. Related structures The ligamentum arteriosum connects the commencement of the left pulmonary artery to the aortic arch. The blood bypasses the lungs through the ductus arteriosus during embryonic circulation. This becomes the ligamentum arteriosum postnatal as pulmonary circulation begins. The aortic knob is the prominent shadow of the aortic arch on a frontal ...


Chris Coons: The Bearded Marxist

by Stephan Tawney on September 18, 2010
I’ve spent some time slamming Christine O’Donnell so it’s only fair I point out the biggest problem with her opponent: He once proudly admitted to being a Marxist. Yes, really.
An article Democrat Chris Coons wrote for his college newspaper may not go over so well in corporation-friendly Delaware, where he already faces an uphill battle for Vice President Joe Biden’s old Senate seat.
The title? “Chris Coons: The Making of a Bearded Marxist.
Again, that’s the title that Coons himself gave the article.
In the article, Coons, then 21 years old and about to graduate from Amherst College, chronicled his transformation from a sheltered, conservative-minded college student who had worked for former GOP Delaware Sen. William Roth and had campaigned for Ronald Reagan in 1980 into a cynical young adult who was distrustful of American power and willing to question the American notion of free enterprise.
What happened? He visited Kenya — coincidentally Obama’s fatherland.
The source of his conversion, Coons wrote, was a trip to Kenya he took during the spring semester of his junior year—a time away from America, he wrote, that served as a “catalyst” in altering a conservative political outlook that he was growing increasingly uncomfortable with.
“My friends now joke that something about Kenya, maybe the strange diet, or the tropical sun, changed my personality; Africa to them seems a catalytic converter that takes in clean-shaven, clear-thinking Americans and sends back bearded Marxists,” Coons wrote, noting that at one time he had been a “proud founding member of the Amherst College Republicans.”
“[I]t is only too easy to return from Africa glad to be American and smugly thankful for our wealth and freedom,” added Coons. “Instead, Amherst had taught me to question, so in turn I questioned Amherst, and America.”
Coons went on:
In one passage of the article, Coons explains how in the months leading up to the trip abroad “leftists” on campus and college professors had begun to “challenge the basic assumptions” he had formed about America.
A course on cultural anthropology, noted Coons, had “undermined the accepted value of progress and the cultural superiority of the West,” while a class on the Vietnam War led him to “suspect…that the ideal of America as a ‘beacon of freedom and justice, providing hope for the world’ was not exactly based in reality.”
And this is why, no matter how nutty Christine O’Donnell may have sounded in her past, I’ll still support her over Chris Coons.
I’d rather have a somewhat-nutty defender of the free market and America than a far-leftist guy who proudly admitted to being a “bearded Marxist” who says he discovered that America is not a beacon of freedom and justice.

3 Responses to “Chris Coons: The Bearded Marxist”

  1. Sam Brown Says: 
    I would have to agree with you on this one… Christine O’Donnell has a sketchy past and a sketchy present, she is a religious fanatic, and a person for whom I generally wouldn’t vote, unless she were running against someone who can even jokingly call himself a Marxist — and that is what is happening.
    Once again this year it is time to “hold you nose and vote”, for the one who stinks less.
    …Sam
  2. george petras Says: 
    she’s not a religious fanatic. thats your opinion and has not fact ! her religion does not matter in being qualified for a govt position.
    your picking christines past. you are finding reasons to not vote for her. all of the crap doesnt matter ! she’s an ordinary person running for office and thats exactly what we need right now ! you out of touch political people dont know what is happeneing right now, and you know what. im not gunna tell you if HE gets elected and republicans dont take back both houses. you will find out for yourself. you will fn cry cry cry !
    i think your problem is that you are probably an athiest. you hate god and god is the only thing america needs right now to work thru the people that work in government to make them moral and honorable so that they do what is right for the people and more importantly THE COUNTRY !
    you have no morals and no honor. therefore you are unqualified for office
  3. george petras Says: 
    anybody can run for office. you dont need to be a stupid harvard grad or a yale grad. thats what liberals and elites have made running for office be. you do realize that you do not need to be a “harvard grad” to be a “civil servant” of the people.. you see how that sounds ???
    god. all you have to do is represent the people within your district. you dont need to be a lawyer to do that obviously.
    and thats the way our founding fathers intended running for office intended it to be. you’d do your time AND GO THE HECK HOME ! instead reps have turned into career politicians and as a result have became out of touch with the american people.
    i dont need moderation. im correct. and thats all there is to it.

Leave a Reply